IHS Chemical Week

EnviroTech :: Regulatory

Beyond Cap-and-Trade?

Part Two: Economic Costs Could Be High

12:05 PM MST | February 10, 2010 | Vincent Valk

This is part two of a three-part web series on the implications of cap-and-trade's potential failure in the U.S. Part one, which focuses on legal issues, can be found here. Part three, which will appear Friday, will focus on legislative and political issues. Economically, the costs of CAA regulation are unclear. However, economic costs would very likely be higher than those under cap-and-trade, Morris says. "There is a broad consensus amongst economists that it [Clean Air Act] is an inefficient way to control GHGs," Morris says. Brookings estimates that...

This information is only available to Chemical Week subscribers.


Forgot your user ID or password?
Click here to have it sent to you.

Not an IHS Chemical Week subscriber yet?

Here's why you should be:

  • 31 issues of Chemical Week magazine a year in print or digital format
  • Real time news and analysis on chemweek.com 
  • 20+ years of online archives
  • Topical e-newsletters that capture the most impactful events
  • Special issues with a regional or company focus
  • Global Outlook issue

Subscribe now


contact us | about us | privacy policy | sitemap

ihsCopyright © IHS, Inc.All rights reserved.Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

North Asia Russia Southeast Asia China India/Pakistan Middle East Eastern Europe Western Europe Central America Canada USA Australia/New Zealand South America Africa